[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Undeliverable: CSET 09 Call for Participation (co-located with the USENIX Security Symposium)

Delivery has failed to these recipients or distribution lists:

christina.carbonell@easyi.com
The recipient's e-mail address was not found in the recipient's e-mail system. Microsoft Exchange will not try to redeliver this message for you. Please check the e-mail address and try resending this message, or provide the following diagnostic text to your system administrator.
Sent by Microsoft Exchange Server 2007





Diagnostic information for administrators:

Generating server: saig.frd.global

christina.carbonell@easyi.com
#550 5.1.1 RESOLVER.ADR.RecipNotFound; not found ##

Original message headers:

Received: from mail62.messagelabs.com (117.120.16.147) by
 AUSYDHC-EXCH1.saig.frd.global (10.195.25.26) with Microsoft SMTP Server id
 8.1.375.2; Sun, 12 Jul 2009 10:26:50 +1000
X-VirusChecked: Checked
X-Env-Sender: owner-ias-opportunities@cerias.purdue.edu
X-Msg-Ref: server-9.tower-62.messagelabs.com!1247358407!39177629!1
X-StarScan-Version: 6.0.0; banners=-,-,-
X-Originating-IP: [128.10.243.21]
X-SpamReason: No, hits=1.0 required=7.0 tests=BODY_DONG,BODY_RANDOM_LONG
Received: (qmail 6473 invoked from network); 12 Jul 2009 00:26:48 -0000
Received: from basm.cerias.purdue.edu (HELO basm.cerias.purdue.edu)
 (128.10.243.21)  by server-9.tower-62.messagelabs.com with SMTP; 12 Jul 2009
 00:26:48 -0000
Received: from basm.cerias.purdue.edu (localhost [127.0.0.1])	by
 basm.cerias.purdue.edu (8.13.6/8.13.6/PURDUE_CERIAS-2.0) with ESMTP id
 n6C0600b024057	for <ias-opportunities-outgoing@basm.cerias.purdue.edu>; Sat,
 11 Jul 2009 20:06:00 -0400 (EDT)
Received: (from majordomo@localhost)	by basm.cerias.purdue.edu
 (8.13.6/8.13.6/Submit) id n6C060L2024056	for ias-opportunities-outgoing; Sat,
 11 Jul 2009 20:06:00 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from santanni.cerias.purdue.edu (santanni.cerias.purdue.edu
 [128.10.252.25])	by basm.cerias.purdue.edu (8.13.6/8.13.6/PURDUE_CERIAS-2.0)
 with ESMTP id n6C05jrK024051	for <ias-opportunities@basm.cerias.purdue.edu>;
 Sat, 11 Jul 2009 20:05:45 -0400 (EDT)
Received: by santanni.cerias.purdue.edu (Postfix)	id E611F1838C; Sat, 11 Jul
 2009 20:05:44 -0400 (EDT)
Delivered-To: ias-opportunities@cerias.purdue.edu
Received: from caduceus1.gmu.edu (caduceus1.gmu.edu [129.174.0.40])	by
 santanni.cerias.purdue.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id B0D7D18387	for
 <ias-opportunities@cerias.purdue.edu>; Sat, 11 Jul 2009 20:05:34 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from Andromeda.home ([96.231.160.219]) by caduceus1.gmu.edu (Sun
 Java System Messaging Server 6.2-2.05 (built Apr 28 2005)) with ESMTPSA id
 <0KMN009386X93I70@caduceus1.gmu.edu> for ias-opportunities@cerias.purdue.edu;
 Sat, 11 Jul 2009 20:05:33 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Sat, 11 Jul 2009 20:05:32 -0400
From: Angelos Stavrou <astavrou@gmu.edu>
Subject: [ias-opportunities] CSET 09 Call for Participation (co-located with the USENIX Security
 Symposium)
To: <ias-opportunities@cerias.purdue.edu>
Message-ID: <6C25130C-E0B9-46E3-A44C-6DEDBEFFF508@gmu.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.935.3)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="WINDOWS-1252"; format=flowed; delsp=yes
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Sender: <owner-ias-opportunities@cerias.purdue.edu>
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: Angelos Stavrou <astavrou@gmu.edu>
Return-Path: owner-ias-opportunities@cerias.purdue.edu

Reporting-MTA: dns;saig.frd.global
Received-From-MTA: dns;mail62.messagelabs.com
Arrival-Date: Sun, 12 Jul 2009 00:26:50 +0000

Final-Recipient: rfc822;christina.carbonell@easyi.com
Action: failed
Status: 5.1.1
Diagnostic-Code: smtp;550 5.1.1 RESOLVER.ADR.RecipNotFound; not found
--- Begin Message --- Please accept our apologies if you receive multiple copies of the same announcement.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

CALL FOR PARTICIPATION

We invite you to attend the Workshop on Cyber Security
Experimentation and Test (CSET '09) on August 10, 2009 in Montreal,
Canada. The CSET'09 workshop is co-located with the USENIX Security
Symposium.

Workshop URL: http://www.usenix.org/event/cset09/

CSET '09 is bringing together researchers and testbed developers to
share their experiences and define a forward-looking agenda for the
development of scientific, realistic evaluation approaches for security
threats and defenses; it provides an important community forum for the
exploration of transformational advances in the field of cyber security
experimentation and test.

This year we have an exciting program, which includes 9 papers on
security experimentation, a keynote address by Dr Michael Van Putte
from DARPA and a panel on science of security experimentation.

******************************
WORKSHOP PROGRAM
******************************
9:00 a.m.–9:15 a.m.
---------------------------
Opening Remarks
Program Co-Chairs: Jelena Mirkovic, USC Information Sciences Institute (ISI); Angelos Stavrou, George Mason University
General Chair: Terry V. Benzel, USC Information Sciences Institute (ISI)

9:15 a.m.–9:45 a.m.
---------------------------
Keynote Address
The Future of Cyber Security Experimentation and Test
Michael VanPutte, DARPA

10:00 a.m.–11:00 a.m.
---------------------------
Session on Security Education
A Highly Immersive Approach to Teaching Reverse Engineering
Golden G. Richard III, University of New Orleans

Collective Views of the NSA/CSS Cyber Defense Exercise on Curricula and Learning Objectives
William J. Adams and Efstratios L. Gavas, United States Merchant Marine Academy; Tim Lacey, Air Force Institute of Technology; Sylvain P. Leblanc, Royal Military College of Canada

11:00 a.m.–noon
---------------------------
Session on Security Experimentation
Evaluating Security Products with Clinical Trials
Anil Somayaji and Yiru Li, Carleton Computer Security Lab; Hajime Inoue, ATC-NY; José M. Fernandez, École Polytechnique Montréal; Richard Ford, Florida Institute of Technology

The Heisenberg Measuring Uncertainty in Lightweight Virtualization Testbeds
Quan Jia, Zhaohui Wang, and Angelos Stavrou, George Mason University

1:00 p.m.–2:30 p.m.
---------------------------
Session on Testbeds
The Virtual Power System Testbed and Inter-Testbed Integration
David C. Bergman, Dong Jin, David M. Nicol, and Tim Yardley, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign

Dartmouth Internet Security Testbed (DIST): Building a Campus-wide Wireless Testbed
Sergey Bratus, David Kotz, Keren Tan, William Taylor, Anna Shubina, and Bennet Vance, Dartmouth College; Michael Locasto, George Mason University

An Emulation of GENI Access Control
Soner Sevinc and Larry Peterson, Princeton University; Trevor Jim and Mary Fernández, AT&T Labs Research

2:45 p.m.–3:45 p.m.
---------------------------
Session on Experimentation Tools
Payoff-Based IDS Evaluation
Michael Collins, RedJack, LLC

Toward Instrumenting Network Warfare Competitions to Generate Labeled Datasets
Benjamin Sangster, T.J. O'Connor, Thomas Cook, Robert Fanelli, Erik Dean, William J. Adams, Chris Morrell, Gregory Conti, United States Military Academy

4:00 p.m.–5:30 p.m.
---------------------------
Panel on Science of Security Experimentation

Panelists: John McHugh, Dalhousie University; Jennifer Bayuk, Jennifer L Bayuk LLC; Minaxi Gupta, Indiana University; Roy Maxion, Carnegie Mellon University

There is currently no established best practice for evaluation of practical research security solutions. Not only do we lack benchmarks and metrics for security testing, we also don't agree on testing approaches, test setup, or even evaluation goals. Published work abounds with ad hoc, unrealistic, and unrepeatable test strategies. It is impossible to compare related solutions because they usually have been tested in very different settings, and their implementation was not made public. It is further impossible to build on the work of others without re-implementing their solution and evaluation approach from scratch. This dilutes the strength of a research community and slows down the progress.

This panel will discuss challenges to scientifically rigorous security experimentation, including:

* the choice of an appropriate evaluation approach from theory, simulation, emulation, trace-based analysis, and deployment
* how/where to gather appropriate and realistic data to reproduce relevant security threats
* how to faithfully reproduce data in an experimental setting
* how to promote reuse and sharing, and discourage reinvention in the community
* requirements for and obstacles to creation of widely accepted benchmarks for popular security areas

**************************************
We hope to see you in Montreal!

CSET'09 Organizers
Terry Benzel (tbenzel at isi.edu)
Angelos Stavrou (astavrou at gmu.edu)
Jelena Mirkovic (sunshine at isi.edu)


--- End Message ---